Key Takeaways:

• A brand new lawsuit claims Spotify ignored bot-generated streams that inflated Drake’s numbers.
• The go well with, filed by rapper RBX, alleges billions of faux performs harmed different artists financially.
• Spotify denies wrongdoing and says it actively removes pretend streams and penalizes dangerous actors.

Spotify is dealing with a brand new lawsuit alleging it ignored “billions of fraudulent streams” of Drake’s music. Filed on Sunday (Nov. 2) by Snoop Dogg’s cousin and rapper RBX (né Eric Dwayne Collins), the submitting claims the streaming big knowingly turned a “blind eye” to bots.

According to the authorized paperwork, obtained by NBC News, the “mass scale” fraud inflicted “massive financial harm to legitimate artists, songwriters, producers, and other rightsholders.” Collins’ attorneys wrote, “Billions of fraudulent streams have been generated with respect to songs of ‘the most-streamed artist of all time,’ Aubrey Drake Graham, professionally known as Drake.”

They continued, “But while the streaming fraud with respect to Drake’s songs may be one example, it does not stand alone.” Interestingly, although, he’s the one instance particularly talked about all through the submitting.

“We cannot comment on pending litigation. However, Spotify in no way benefits from the industry-wide challenge of artificial streaming,” a spokesperson for the streaming service stated in a press release. “We heavily invest in always-improving, best-in-class systems to combat it and safeguard artist payouts with strong protections like removing fake streams, withholding royalties, and charging penalties.”

The firm referenced “one bad actor” indicted for stealing $10 million from streaming providers, music-streaming-fraud-aided-artificial-intelligence”>presumably producer Michael Smith, noting that solely $60,000 of that quantity was tied to Spotify. The lawsuit additionally alleged that Drake had “accumulated far higher total streams” than different artists with “far more users,” although it didn’t embrace any knowledge or appendix to assist the declare.

Per the grievance, the supposed “fraudulent streaming” occurred between January 2022 and as lately as September 2025. As music/music-features/lawsuit-spotify-drake-streams-1235457737/”>Rolling Stone famous, the go well with is searching for over $5 million and requests {that a} federal choose “certify the lawsuit as a class action, order Spotify to identify alleged victims, and oversee a jury trial seeking compensatory and punitive damages.”

It’s value mentioning that whereas Drake is repeatedly talked about, and definitely a focus, within the lawsuit, he isn’t named as a defendant. Ironically, the Canadian celebrity himself sued Universal music Group over Kendrick Lamar’s “Not Like Us” earlier this yr, although a choose ultimately dismissed the case.

In a authorized petition filed earlier than then, he alleged that Spotify boosted the diss track’s streams and licensed it at “drastically reduced rates.”