Mary J. Blige was blocked from shifting Misa Hylton’s $5 million lawsuit to a enterprise courtroom after a choose dominated the case belongs in civil courtroom.

Mary J. Blige’s try and switch a $5 million lawsuit filed by Misa Hylton to a New York courtroom that handles advanced enterprise disputes failed as a choose dominated the case didn’t meet the necessities for the specialised venue.

Blige’s authorized workforce argued the case, centered on allegations that she interfered with Hylton’s administration deal involving rapper Vado, was too intricate for normal civil courtroom.

They claimed the lawsuit involved “complex” issues such as California law, contract enforcement and corporate standing.

However, Judge Suzanne J. Adams rejected the movement, stating that the claims had been tied to leisure and artist administration agreements, not the kind of industrial dealings the courtroom’s Commercial Division was designed to deal with.

In her ruling, Adams wrote that “the complexity of the case, the choice of law issues, and the amount in controversy do not warrant transfer to the Commercial Division.”

The lawsuit, filed in April 2025, accuses Mary J. Blige of pressuring Vado to desert his settlement with Hylton’s M.I.S.A. Management in favor of signing with Blige’s label, Beautiful Life Productions.

Hylton alleges Blige withheld album releases and touring alternatives from Vado until he lower ties along with her.

Hylton is searching for $5 million in damages, in addition to an injunction to stop Blige from interfering in future enterprise relationships.

The criticism additionally names Blige’s head of safety, whom Hylton claims is her boyfriend, and accuses him of warning Vado that he’d “lose out on opportunities” if he stayed with Hylton.

Blige has dismissed the claims as “patently frivolous” and “meritless,” suggesting the lawsuit is a private assault designed to power a settlement.

Her attorneys argue that Hylton’s firm shouldn’t be a sound company and that she lacks the right licensing to function as a expertise agent.

Blige can be searching for sanctions in opposition to Hylton and her lawyer, alleging the go well with was filed for publicity and leverage.

Hylton’s lawyer stated they tried to resolve the dispute privately, however turned to the courts when Blige’s workforce stopped responding.

As of late July 2025, the case stays energetic in civil courtroom, with Blige pushing for dismissal and Hylton standing agency on her claims.

Related