Druski was cleared of involvement in a 2018 assault case tied to Diddy after a decide questioned why legal professionals saved him within the swimsuit.

Druski scored a authorized win in a high-profile sexual assault lawsuit tied to Diddy“>Diddy, after a federal decide warned the plaintiff’s attorneys they could possibly be penalized for persevering with to pursue claims in opposition to the comic regardless of overwhelming proof he wasn’t there.

The lawsuit, filed by Ashley Parham, accuses Diddy and several other others of a violent gang rape at a 2018 get together in Orinda, California.

Parham alleges Druski Diddy-accuser/”>lined her in child oil or lubricant and used her physique “like a slip and slide” in the course of the assault. She additionally claims Diddy recorded the assault and threatened her afterward.

Druski, who was not a part of the leisure trade on the time, has denied any involvement.

On Tuesday (August 19), U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin dominated that whereas legal professionals had some foundation to call Druski within the amended grievance filed in March 2025, their refusal to drop him after clear-cut proof emerged may result in sanctions.

His authorized staff submitted telephone and financial institution data displaying he was in Georgia on March 23, 2018 — the evening of the alleged assault. His debit card was used within the Atlanta space and all telephone exercise originated from Georgia that day.

Despite the documentation, Parham’s attorneys instructed the court docket in July they’d “no desire to dismiss” Druski from the case.

Judge Lin mentioned that the stance “appears to lack any reasonable basis” in gentle of the proof and ordered the legal professionals to clarify why they shouldn’t face sanctions.

The court docket gave the authorized staff till September 9 to justify their actions or voluntarily take away Druski from the lawsuit. Failing to take action may end in dismissal of the claims in opposition to him and a doable order to pay his authorized charges.

Druski beforehand referred to as the accusations “fabricated lies” and mentioned, “I have never met any of the individuals involved. I was not in California at the time of the alleged incident.”

The unique grievance additionally named Odell Beckham Jr., who additionally denied any involvement.

Parham’s authorized illustration is being led by lawyer Ariel Mitchell, who can be dealing with separate authorized bother.

Diddy has filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit in opposition to Mitchell and Newsmax, accusing them of spreading false and malicious claims to wreck his fame.

Related