Megan Thee Stallion secured a significant courtroom win in Miami, the place a federal jury discovered blogger Milagro Gramz answerable for defamation and harassment tied to AI-generated deepfake content material and a chronic on-line marketing campaign allegedly related to Tory Lanez.

The jury has discovered Milagro defamed Megan Thee Stallion and deliberately inflicted emotional misery by coordinating with Tory Lanez and selling the deep faux video at subject in the course of the trial.

Court reporter Meghann Cuniff defined that the jury discovered her liable on all three claims, however the defamation declare would possibly nonetheless go away as a result of Megan’s attorneys forgot a easy rule: they have been speculated to warn Milagro earlier than suing her and so they didn’t.

Cuniff added that the damages totaled $75,000, together with punitive damages.

The verdict, delivered after a week-long trial, marked a pivotal second within the rapper’s authorized battle towards digital misinformation and focused harassment.

Megan filed the lawsuit in October 2024, accusing Gramz of spreading a pornographic deepfake video and false narratives that broken her repute and psychological well being.

Jurors heard emotional testimony from the Houston artist, who detailed the toll the harassment took on her profession and well-being, describing how the smear marketing campaign led to the lack of not less than 4 music offers, every reportedly value round $1 million.

Meg also revealed she underwent a $240,000 therapy program to cope with the trauma.

The case stems from the 2020 taking pictures incident by which Lanez was convicted of taking pictures Megan within the foot. He is at present serving a 10-year jail sentence.

Prosecutors alleged that Gramz acted as a “paid surrogate” for Lanez, launching what they described as a “sustained campaign of harassment and cyberbullying” within the aftermath of his conviction.

Milagro Gramz, who manufacturers herself as a voice of city tradition, defended her actions on the stand, calling her content material “a new form of journalism,” however the 9 jurors apparently disagreed.

The case additionally examined Florida’s lately enacted deepfake regulation, which permits people to pursue authorized motion over AI-manipulated photos. The final result may affect how courts deal with comparable disputes involving synthetic intelligence and on-line defamation.

The jury’s ruling affirms Megan’s claims that she was the goal of a coordinated effort to hurt her public picture. With the legal responsibility section concluded, jurors will now decide the quantity of damages she is owed.

Meg’s followers have been elated. One person stated “@theestallion was very brave to do this. The question of whether ‘bloggers’ should be allowed to defame people should be challenged. Abuse of your platform should have consequences.”

Related