Diddy-combs”>Diddy misplaced a key authorized battle Tuesday (September 30) in Manhattan federal courtroom, the place a choose refused to toss out two prostitution-related convictions, setting the stage for his sentencing on Friday (October 3) on expenses tied to the Mann Act.

The 55-year-old Hip-Hop mogul was discovered responsible in July of arranging for male sex employees to cross state strains for paid encounters together with his girlfriends—violations of the Mann Act, a 1910 federal legislation initially geared toward curbing sex trafficking.

In earlier courtroom filings, Diddy’s attorneys claimed the conviction was unprecedented and an overreach into his private habits involving “freak offs.”

“This is wildly out of proportion to the conduct at issue—threesomes where fully competent adult men and women voluntarily crossed state lines and had consensual sex with each other, and the defendant made no money from the conduct,” Diddy’s attorneys stated in courtroom filings. “We are unaware of any other Mann Act prosecution based on such conduct.”

U.S. District Judge Arun Subramanian rejected Diddy’s bid to overturn the convictions, brushing apart his authorized group’s argument that the costs have been an overreach.

Diddy was acquitted of extra critical expenses, together with sex trafficking and racketeering conspiracy, which might have carried a life sentence. However, the 2 Mann Act violations nonetheless carry vital weight—as much as 20 years in jail.

Defense legal professional Alexandra Shapiro painted the mogul as a voyeur who loved filming and watching novice grownup content material, which she stated falls beneath First Amendment protections.

Prosecutors countered that Diddy reimbursed his ex-girlfriends for arranging the sexual liaisons, making him culpable beneath federal legislation.

Testimony from Cassie, Jane Doe and different girls performed a central function within the case, with prosecutors alleging Diddy financed the encounters by way of his companions, successfully paying for sex throughout state strains.

Judge Subramanian issued his ruling swiftly, solidifying the convictions and clearing the trail for sentencing.

Federal prosecutors are in search of a sentence of 11 years and three months, citing what they describe as violent and coercive conduct. Prosecutors allege Diddy used threats and intimidation towards girls and confirmed no regret.

They are additionally pushing for the utmost allowable fantastic, arguing that his wealth and affect shouldn’t protect him from full accountability. Prosecutors stated the proof confirmed “a pattern of abuse” and that Diddy “has not accepted responsibility for his actions.”

Meanwhile, Diddy’s protection group is asking for a drastically diminished sentence. They argue he has already served the equal of 14 months in pretrial detention since September 2024.

They are requesting dwelling confinement as a substitute of extra jail time, citing his lack of prior convictions and the character of the costs he was acquitted on. Judge Subramanian has denied bail a number of instances, citing public security issues and the seriousness of the costs.

Related