Diddy-sexual-assault-lawsuit/”>CJ Wallace, the son of the late rapper Notorious B.I.G., is urgent forward with a defamation lawsuit towards music publicist Jonathan Hay. However, the case has stalled over procedural challenges. According to experiences, Wallace just lately instructed a choose that repeated efforts to formally serve Hay with court docket papers have been unsuccessful. Without correct service, the case can not transfer ahead. Hay has not publicly commented on the matter.

The authorized dispute stems from allegations Hay has made towards Wallace in separate filings. Hay has accused Wallace of sexual assault and of facilitating misconduct involving Sean “Diddy” Combs throughout studio classes in 2020. Wallace has denied these claims in court docket paperwork. He has rejected allegations that he participated in sexual acts with Combs, attended so-called “freak-offs,” or organized conditions by which Hay was harmed. Wallace’s attorneys describe the accusations as false and defamatory.

In a current submitting, Wallace said that seven makes an attempt have been made to serve Hay since November 2025. During one go to, a lady recognized as Hay’s daughter reportedly instructed a course of server that Hay had moved out months earlier and had not remained involved. Wallace’s lawyer, Jeremiah Reynolds, additionally requested that Hay’s authorized crew settle for service electronically in early January. However, that request was declined. Wallace has indicated that he might rent a non-public investigator to find Hay so the case can proceed.

From Remix Dispute to Courtroom Clash

Wallace and the property of his father have steered that the dispute is tied to enterprise disagreements over Hay’s “Ready To Dance” remixes in 2020. The property declined to launch these remixes. They argue that the allegations surfaced after that call. Hay, in filings of his personal, has alleged that he was assaulted throughout a 2020 studio session related to these remixes and that Wallace was current. Attorneys for Wallace deny these assertions, and no legal expenses have been introduced in reference to Hay’s claims.

For now, the court docket’s fast focus is procedural reasonably than substantive. Until service is accomplished, the choose can not totally handle the deserves of the defamation case. The competing accounts stay sharply at odds, and the litigation seems prone to proceed.