According to court docket paperwork, Tompkins was paid $80,000 underneath the deal and promised future royalties. The settlement defines the rights as “unconditional, irrevocable, exclusive, and perpetual,” prohibiting her from publicly discussing or cashing in on her private story with out G-Unit’s authorization.

The lawsuit accuses Tompkins of breaching the contract by sharing interviews and movies recounting her previous with the mogul and their son, Marquise. Her allegations embody claims that fifty Cent bodily assaulted her throughout her being pregnant in 1996 and continued verbal and bodily abuse all through their relationship.

G-Unit asserts that Tompkins reignited public curiosity in her story following a viral social media publish tied to the high-profile Diddy trial. The firm alleges she used the renewed consideration to reintroduce and monetize content material that G-Unit owns completely.

“Tompkins knowingly violated the agreement and acknowledged its existence as she continued sharing the material,” stated Reena Jain, legal professional for G-Unit. Jain argued that the injury extends past misplaced revenue, emphasizing that the deal’s worth hinged on exclusivity.

50 reportedly acquired the rights not just for future biographical initiatives but in addition to forestall Tompkins from exploiting their shared historical past for private achieve.

“His concerns,” Jain acknowledged, “have now been realized.”

The lawsuit requests a court docket order barring Tompkins from selling her story, not less than $1 million in damages, reimbursement of authorized charges, and extra aid. The contract additionally consists of an indemnification clause that holds Tompkins financially answerable for any losses that will end result.

Tompkins has but to reply publicly.