Druski is beneath renewed authorized scrutiny after legal professional Ariel Mitchell accused him of deceptive the court docket about who owned the cellphone that allegedly positioned him in Georgia throughout a 2018 assault in California.

Mitchell, a Miami-based lawyer, filed a movement asking a federal choose to rethink potential sanctions towards her within the Ashley Parham v. Sean Combs case.

She claims Druski and his authorized staff misrepresented his cellphone data by asserting the quantity belonged to his mom, when in truth, she says, it was registered beneath his grandmother’s title.

According to Mitchell, this element is vital as a result of it undermines the court docket’s earlier conclusion that Druski was “almost certainly” in Georgia in the course of the alleged incident.

She argues that if the cellphone wasn’t in his title, then the situation information tied to it doesn’t show the place he truly was.

“The court relied on a misleading narrative about which number was his,” Mitchell acknowledged in her submitting. She believes this misstep influenced the choose’s choice to think about sanctions towards her and her co-counsel.

The dispute stems from a federal lawsuit filed by Ashley Parham, who accused Diddy” and others of sexual assault at a home close to Orinda, California in 2018.

Parham later amended her criticism to incorporate Druski, alleging he poured child oil on her and used her “like a slip and slide” in the course of the incident. Druski, whose actual title is Drew Desbordes, has denied all allegations.

In response, Druski’s attorneys submitted cellphone and financial institution data to indicate he was in Georgia on the time. U.S. District Judge Rita F. Lin discovered the proof credible and warned Parham’s authorized staff that persevering with to pursue claims towards Druski “appears to lack any reasonable basis.”

Diddy-lawsuit-judge-threatens-lawyers/”>The choose questioned why attorneys didn’t drop Druski from the case after reviewing the exculpatory proof.

But Mitchell now argues that newly surfaced proof modifications the equation. She says it proves the cellphone quantity in query was a part of a household plan beneath Druski’s grandmother, not his mom, as beforehand claimed.

That discrepancy, she says, leaves open the chance that another person was utilizing the cellphone, or that Druski’s location wasn’t definitively tied to the gadget.

Her movement seeks to erase the specter of sanctions and reopen discovery, which might permit her to dig deeper into Druski’s whereabouts on the night time in query.

Mitchell can also be entangled in different lawsuits involving Diddy, together with one representing former “Making the Band” contestant Sara Rivers. That case was partially dismissed and is now on enchantment. Mitchell beforehand represented Adria English in a separate go well with towards Combs in New York federal court docket.

Meanwhile, Combs has filed a $100 million defamation lawsuit towards Mitchell, NewsNation mum or dad firm Nexstar, and journalist Courtney Burgess over televised statements associated to alleged sex tapes.

The court docket has not but dominated on Mitchell’s request for reconsideration.

Related