Tyrone Blackburn’s try to repair AI-generated quotation errors in Fat Joe’s lawsuit was denied by a federal decide.

Tyrone Blackburn tried to wash up a authorized mess in rapper Fat Joe‘s defamation lawsuit however was blocked by a federal decide after admitting that his courtroom submitting contained flawed citations that appeared to have been created by synthetic intelligence.

The Manhattan-based lawyer, who represents each co-defendant Terrance Dixon and his personal regulation agency, requested U.S. District Judge Jennifer L. Rochon for permission to switch his authentic movement to dismiss with a corrected model.

Blackburn instructed the courtroom that his crew had found “a number of inadvertent citation inaccuracies” and stated the adjustments had been obligatory “for clarity and accuracy in the record.”

He acknowledged that a number of authorized references within the submitting had been outdated, incorrect or misquoted, however insisted the errors didn’t have an effect on the core of his authorized argument. He claimed the errors had been unintentional and urged the courtroom to ignore the flawed doc.

Judge Rochon denied the request, noting that Fat Joe’s authorized crew had already filed their opposition. She dominated that Blackburn must handle the problems in his reply transient, fairly than submitting a brand new amended grievance with fixes.

Fat Joe’s attorneys had already flagged the questionable citations, declaring lacking case names, altered language and formatting that steered using generative AI instruments.

In courtroom filings, they stated the movement included “misrepresentations and fabrications of legal authority clearly generated by AI,” and listed “at least ten instances” of “hallucinated” case regulation.

The Bronx rapper is suing Dixon and Blackburn for defamation, accusing them of trying to extort him by spreading false claims of sexual misconduct and underage relationships.

IMAGE

The lawsuit describes a coordinated smear campaign that included social media posts accusing Fat Joe of having relationships with underage girls and murder-for-hire plots.

Fat Joe’s legal professionals known as Blackburn’s submitting “fundamentally untrustworthy” and stated he “irresponsibly relied on artificial intelligence-generated content without manual verification.”

They argued that his conduct “overshadows Defendants’ substantive arguments” and urged the courtroom to impose sanctions.

This isn’t the primary time Blackburn has been accused of utilizing AI-generated authorized citations.

In a separate defamation case involving pastor T.D. Jakes, U.S. District Judge William Stickman ordered Blackburn to pay greater than $76,000 in authorized charges after submitting filings with false citations and fabricated quotes.

Stickman described Blackburn’s actions as “clear ethical violations of the highest order.”

Jake’s authorized crew has pointed to the Fat Joe case as further evidence of a pattern, arguing that Blackburn’s repeated use of AI-generated filings shows a disregard for legal standards, even after Blackburn claimed he took courses to teach himself on the way to use AI.

The decide in Fat Joe’s case has not but dominated on the movement to dismiss.

Related