
GloRilla Asks Judge To Toss “Natural, No BBL” Lawsuit, Attorneys Say Phrase Is “Too Common”

Image
Image Credit
Steph Chambers / Staff by way of Getty Images
Image Alt
GloRilla performs throughout halftime at 2025 AT&T WNBA All-Star Game
Image Size
landscape-medium
Key Takeaways:
- GloRilla’s authorized crew is difficult a lawsuit over her “natural, no BBL” lyric, calling the phrase too generic to copyright.
- Instagram influencer Natalie Henderson claims she coined the phrase and is suing over its use within the rapper’s “NEVER FIND.”
- The case highlights the rising pressure between social media creators and artists over viral language in music.
GloRilla has no plans to entertain the lawsuit that influencer Natalie Henderson filed in opposition to her over the “natural, no BBL” lyric on 2024’s “NEVER FIND.” The case claims that the bar is simply too much like Henderson’s viral catchphrase and a track she wrote. On Monday (Sept. 8), the Memphis rapper’s authorized crew moved to have the case dismissed completely, for the reason that phrase is “too common.”
According to a submitting obtained by Billboard, the rapper’s attorneys argued, “The phrase ‘natural[e], no BBL’ — referring to a person with a natural body who has not undergone the ‘Brazilian Butt Lift’ cosmetic procedure — is too common, everyday, trite and clichéd to be protectable by copyright.” Glo’s authorized crew additionally pointed to at the least seven different examples of artists who’ve used the identical phrases, together with her “Get In There” collaborator, Real Boston Richey.
“The phrase at issue in plaintiff’s song is not original and thus not copyrightable,” the movement continued. Henderson possible has a difficult case forward of her, as copyright legislation not often covers brief, extensively used phrases. On prime of that, the GLORIOUS artist’s attorneys talked about there’s no proof she’d even heard the influencer’s alleged catchphrase.
Henderson’s authentic lawsuit, which she filed in June, claimed there have been “unmistakable similarities between the two works.” Now it’s as much as a decide to determine if that’s sufficient for the case to maneuver ahead. It’s value mentioning that GloRilla is already 2-0 in opposition to copyright claims.
In 2023, Ivory “Mobo Joe” Paynes of Dog House Posse music/music-news/glorilla-producer-lawsuit-tomorrow-new-orleans-rapper-1234750299/”>accused her of sampling his observe “Street of the Westbank” with out permission on “Tomorrow” and “Tomorrow 2.” That go well with was dismissed only a yr later.
Then, in March, rapper Plies dropped his personal lawsuit against Megan Thee Stallion, GloRilla, Cardi B and Soulja Boy. He had accused the 4 of sampling his observe “Me & My Goons” for Glo’s “Wanna Be” earlier than in the end abandoning the declare.
Categories News
Tags Asks Attorneys BBL Common GloRilla Judge lawsuit Natural Phrase Toss