Sean “Diddy” Combs may serve between one and three years in connection along with his newest authorized case, however his attorneys are urgent for a substitute for jail. Lead protection lawyer Marc Agnifilo stated he plans to hunt residence confinement as a part of the sentencing proposal, paired with necessary remedy for anger administration and substance abuse.

According to Agnifilo, Combs has acknowledged dwelling with long-standing private and emotional “deficits” and views this second as a possibility to deal with them. The protection argues that the state jail system can not present the extent of specialised remedy Combs wants, and that focused remedy exterior the correctional atmosphere would provide a extra constructive path ahead.

Agnifilo has already begun assembling a workforce of licensed psychological well being and dependancy specialists who would work with Combs beneath courtroom supervision. The plan would make remedy a proper situation of his launch, with a construction designed to proceed past any interval of confinement. The authorized technique seeks to reframe sentencing as not solely a punitive measure but additionally a framework for sustained restoration.

Combs’ willingness to bear intensive remedy marks a shift in how he’s confronting his private challenges. His attorneys hope this openness will assist persuade the courtroom that rehabilitation in a managed, home-based setting may yield higher long-term outcomes than incarceration.

The ultimate determination will relaxation with the choose, who should weigh whether or not residence confinement with remedy satisfies the ideas of justice, deterrence, and accountability. If accredited, Combs would stay beneath strict supervision whereas partaking each day along with his therapeutic workforce, specializing in addressing the underlying causes of the conduct that led to his authorized troubles.

Agnifilo is predicted to debate the case in better element throughout an interview airing Friday on TMZ Live and streaming on YouTube. The section will discover not solely Combs’ protection technique but additionally the broader implications for a way high-profile defendants could navigate sentencing in instances the place rehabilitation is a central argument.