The authorized conflict between Megan Thee Stallion and Tory Lanez has taken a pointy flip, because the rapper’s attorneys accuse Lanez of launching “petty, misogynistic jabs” throughout a current deposition. The allegations inject recent pressure into an already high-profile case that has remained within the public highlight.

In a submitting submitted in Florida federal courtroom, Megan’s authorized group is asking the choose to sanction Lanez—born Daystar Peterson—who’s at the moment behind bars. They argue he violated a courtroom order that required him to elucidate why he shouldn’t be held in contempt. Their movement stems from a deposition earlier this month, which they described as “disruptive and inflammatory.”

According to Megan’s attorneys, Lanez used the deposition to mock the opposing counsel’s bodily look and hair shade—habits they are saying amounted to harassment reasonably than a authentic authorized trade. “This was not about answering questions,” they wrote, “but undermining the process with targeted disrespect.” Lanez additionally raised eyebrows by allegedly pretending to not perceive primary phrases resembling “meet,” “discuss,” and “approve,” additional irritating the proceedings and fueling requires courtroom intervention.

While no listening to date has been set, Lanez’s attorneys are pushing to fast-track a response. They’ve filed to have Megan cowl the prices of the deposition and have requested {that a} particular grasp be appointed—at Lanez’s expense—to watch future questioning. If the courtroom declines, Megan’s authorized group is asking for a immediate listening to, in response to AllHipHop.

The deposition is tied to Megan’s defamation go well with in opposition to YouTuber Milagro Gramz, whom she accuses of spreading falsehoods in regards to the Lanez case. After failing at hand over key digital proof—together with metadata and personal messages—Gramz was not too long ago ordered to pay $5,000 to cowl Megan’s authorized charges.

Facing mounting authorized payments, Gramz misplaced her authentic authorized group over nonpayment however has since retained attorneys Jeremy McLymont and Ronda Dixon, reportedly with assist from a crowdfunding marketing campaign launched by her supporters.

At its core, this courtroom drama stretches far past the non-public feud between two artists. It continues to form broader conversations about misogyny in media, accountability in celeb tradition, and the function of digital platforms in amplifying misinformation.