Michael Oberlies, Diddy-is-allegedly-preparing-1-billion-suit-targeting-netflix-for-50-cents-docuseries/”>Sean “Diddy” Combs’ longtime private videographer, has addressed the swirling rumors surrounding Netflix’s Sean Combs: The Reckoning. Produced by Diddy-docuseries/”>50 Cent, the four-part sequence has captured widespread consideration. It options interviews with figures from Diddy’s previous, together with members of his interior circle and alleged victims. It additionally consists of beforehand unreleased footage of the music mogul talking along with his lawyer, Marc Agnifilo, shortly earlier than his arrest.

The look of this unseen materials prompted hypothesis about its origins. Some recommend it arose from a “fee dispute or contract issue.” Oberlies, nonetheless, clarified that the controversy occurred throughout his momentary absence from work. He emphasised that it was not tied to any contractual disagreement.

Speaking to Rolling Stone, Oberlies mentioned, “For over two years, we have been diligently compiling a project centered around Sean ‘Diddy’ Combs. The footage in question was not authorized by me or anyone within the rightful channels handling his material. It was instead shared through a third party who temporarily filled in for me while I was out of state. This incident is unrelated to any alleged contract issues or payment disputes. The behavior of those involved reflects poorly on the standard of integrity that every storyteller should uphold. Utilizing footage meant for our project to forge an agenda outside our own signifies not just ethical breaches but also a disregard for our essential narrative.”

Diddy-s-reaction-to-the-docuseries”>Diddy’s Reaction to the Docuseries

After the sequence debuted, Diddy’s staff publicly criticized the manufacturing, calling it a “shameful hit piece.” They emphasised that the footage had by no means been approved for public launch. They additionally harassed Diddy’s years of cautious work to protect his personal narrative. The assertion framed Netflix’s use of the fabric as unfair and illegal, portraying it as a violation of his mental property rights.

Netflix, for its half, defended the sequence. They asserted that every one footage was obtained legally and that customary business practices have been adopted all through manufacturing.