Sean “Diddy” Combs is escalating his dispute with Netflix following the debut of Sean Combs: The Reckoning. This docuseries was executive-produced by 50 Cent. His crew has condemned the challenge as a “shameful hit piece,” arguing that the filmmakers relied on footage he by no means accredited for launch. With the sequence circulating for simply over every week, these near Diddy say he’s making ready an aggressive authorized counter. He needs to regain management over how his story is being introduced.

Reports from shops together with Diddy-family-launching-1b-lawsuit-against-netflix/”>Media Take Out recommend that Diddy and his household are contemplating a sweeping defamation lawsuit that seeks $1 billion in damages. People accustomed to the discussions say the quantity may develop if Netflix doesn’t handle a number of claims featured within the sequence. “This documentary was crafted not as a piece of journalism but as an attack on his character,” an insider mentioned. They characterised the conflict as deeply private for the artist.

In a press release supplied earlier to The Hollywood Reporter, Diddy’s representatives laid out their objections to Netflix’s dealing with of the sequence. “Netflix’s so-called ‘documentary’ is a blatant attempt to harm Mr. Combs’ reputation. The teaser featured on GMA highlights the fact that Netflix relied on appropriated footage. This footage was never authorized for public disclosure. Since he was just 19, Mr. Combs has been gathering material to narrate his own story. It is not only fundamentally unjust but also illegal for Netflix to exploit that content.”

The Stakes of Reputation

Diddy’s authorized crew additionally criticized Netflix for collaborating with Curtis “50 Cent” Jackson. This is a determine whose public rivalry with the mogul has stretched on for years. “It is both incredible and disheartening that Netflix granted creative rein to an individual who harbors a personal vendetta,” they wrote. They argued that the streaming large allowed long-standing tensions to form a challenge that demanded neutrality. Their assertion highlighted Diddy’s respect for Netflix’s chief govt, Ted Sarandos. It additionally talked about his admiration for the legacy of Sarandos’ late father-in-law, Clarence Avant.

For Combs, allowing a longtime adversary to border his life story represents a rupture of belief. “At the very least, he anticipated impartiality from those he esteemed,” the assertion concluded. It emphasised that the dispute is as a lot about stewardship of his narrative as it’s about status.