More than a yr after its debut, Kendrick Lamar’s blistering diss observe aimed toward Drake, “Not Like Us,” continues to be shaping the musical panorama. Apple music has named it the platform’s most-streamed rap tune worldwide for 2025. This recognition makes it the primary hip-hop single to say the title two years in a row. The achievement speaks to the tune’s endurance and the best way it has lodged itself firmly within the broader cultural dialog.

In the world of rap, Lamar’s affect can’t be understated. His momentum surged earlier this yr after a commanding Super Bowl LIX halftime efficiency at New Orleans’ Caesars Superdome. During the occasion, 133.5 million viewers watched him take middle stage. The spectacle reignited dialogue concerning the long-running rigidity between the 2 artists. According to latest court docket filings, it might have added new pressure to Drake’s ongoing authorized struggle. In up to date paperwork, Drake argues that Universal music Group contributed to a “false and malicious” picture of him as a sexual predator. He claims the accusations intensified within the wake of Kendrick’s halftime look. His amended grievance factors to an increase in threats directed at him and his household after the efficiency aired.

New Turns within the Case

The authorized dispute has continued to broaden, with Lamar figuring prominently within the ongoing discussions. Drake’s authorized crew just lately requested an extension on a number of deadlines, citing the calls for of the case and the upcoming vacation season. Their transient is at the moment due December 22. However, either side have requested to maneuver the submitting to January 21. Should the court docket approve the request, Kendrick’s attorneys can be required to reply by March 27.

An extension would additionally give Drake’s lawyer, Michael Gottlieb, added room to handle different high-profile issues. These embody an ongoing lawsuit involving actress Blake Lively. In their most up-to-date submitting, Drake’s attorneys emphasised the stakes of the dispute. They wrote, “This is a high-profile case bearing on issues of public interest such as artistic expression and the scope of defamation law for public figures.” The case, already linked to Lamar, is drawing vital public curiosity.