Milagro Gramz is pushing again in opposition to Megan Thee Stallion of their ongoing authorized conflict over defamation, telling a Miami federal decide that the rapper should show each “actual malice” and quantifiable harm earlier than any payout will be thought of.

In a courtroom submitting submitted November 10, 2025, Gramz — legally often called Milagro Elizabeth Cooper — argued that Megan’s lawsuit doesn’t meet the authorized threshold required underneath the First Amendment. The response counters Megan’s November 6 temporary, which claimed she didn’t want to point out monetary loss to pursue a defamation per se declare.

Gramz’s lawyer, Ronda Dixon, leaned on a landmark U.S. Supreme Court ruling to argue that public figures like Megan should meet a better bar.

“A public figure may not recover for defamation unless she proves, by clear and convincing evidence, that the defendant published the challenged statement with knowledge that it was false or with reckless disregard for whether it was false or not,” the submitting acknowledged.

The protection additionally pointed to Florida regulation to argue that presumed damages don’t apply to “media defendants” when public curiosity is concerned. According to Dixon, the authorized safety extends to bloggers and digital commentators.

“Florida no longer recognizes presumed damages in defamation per se claims against media defendants, unless the plaintiff first proves actual malice,” she wrote.

Gramz’s authorized crew is positioning her as a member of the press, arguing that her commentary about Megan’s public habits, significantly throughout the music/tory-lanez-guilty-megan-thee-stallion.html”>Tory Lanez trial, is a part of protected speech. The protection claims Megan is making an attempt to sidestep constitutional requirements by labeling the statements as “defamation per se” to keep away from proving hurt.

Milagro Gramz’s crew additionally requested the courtroom to dam any jury directions that indicate damages will be assumed. Instead, they argue Megan should present concrete proof that her status suffered because of the statements.

The authorized battle started in 2024 when Megan sued Gramz, accusing her of spreading false details about her character and the occasions surrounding the Tory Lanez capturing case.

Megan alleges that Gramz used her platform to flow into lies, whereas Gramz insists she was commenting on a high-profile trial involving a significant Hip-Hop determine.

Related