Spotify is going through certainly one of its most turbulent weeks but. New lawsuits increase questions concerning the firm’s credibility within the music business. A category-action grievance accuses the streaming big of neglecting to deal with widespread streaming fraud. Spotify has strongly denied the claims, calling them “baseless.” It insists that the corporate uphold equity and accuracy via its detection methods.

Although the lawsuit doesn’t identify Drake as a defendant, it repeatedly cites him as a result of sheer scale of his presence on the platform. Rapper RBX, whose authorized identify is Eric Dwayne Collins, claims that a good portion of Drake’s roughly 37 billion streams from January 2022 to September 2025 have been artificially generated. This was allegedly accomplished by an elaborate community of bots. The allegations have stirred recent debate concerning the authenticity of a number of the platform’s hottest artists and their reported success.

In response, a Spotify consultant reaffirmed the corporate’s dedication to combating synthetic streaming. “While we are unable to comment on pending litigation,” the spokesperson mentioned, “Spotify does not gain from the widespread issue of artificial streaming. We continuously invest in top-tier systems. These are designed to detect and eliminate fake streams, protect artist earnings, and enforce penalties against offenders.”

New Lawsuit Alleges “Modern Payola” Practices

Adding to its mounting authorized strain, Spotify now faces one other class-action go well with filed by New York subscriber Genevieve Capolongo. Reports point out that the grievance accuses the corporate of partaking in “modern payola.” It alleges that Spotify misleads customers by promoting playlist visibility whereas selling itself as an natural discovery platform.

Capolongo’s lawsuit claims that Spotify exploits the belief of its subscribers by blurring the road between real suggestions and paid placements. “Despite being aware that Spotify’s claims regarding personalization are misleading, [Capolongo] continues to suffer harm each time she engages with the platform,” the submitting reads. “She is unable to discern which tracks are genuinely curated and which are pushed through undisclosed financial arrangements. This hinders her ability to make informed listening decisions.”

Spotify has not but commented publicly on the newest submitting.