Lil Durk is pushing again in opposition to federal prosecutors in California who need to hold jurors nameless in his high-profile murder-for-hire case, arguing the transfer would unfairly injury his proper to a good trial.

In a newly filed courtroom movement, attorneys for the Chicago rapper—whose authorized identify is Durk Banks—referred to as the federal government’s request “unnecessary” and primarily based on hypothesis slightly than proof.

Prosecutors declare jurors might face threats or harassment attributable to Durk’s movie star standing and the violent nature of the costs, citing nameless telephone calls and on-line chatter from unnamed “supporters.”

Durk’s authorized workforce, led by lawyer Drew Findling, dismissed these considerations.

“An anonymous jury would undercut transparency and fairness in these proceedings and would be inconsistent with Mr. Banks’ presumption of innocence,” Findling wrote. “Such a drastic measure is justified only when there is a strong reason to believe that anonymity is necessary to protect jurors or the integrity of the trial, and even then, only when accompanied by reasonable safeguards to mitigate prejudice.”

The 31-year-old artist is charged with conspiracy, murder-for-hire leading to loss of life and use of a firearm throughout a violent crime. Prosecutors allege he orchestrated a retaliatory hit after the 2020 killing of his shut good friend King Von, who died throughout a confrontation with rapper Quando Rondo’s crew in Atlanta.

The Justice Department claims that in 2022, Durk’s associates traveled from Chicago to Los Angeles with the intent to focus on Rondo. Instead, they allegedly killed his cousin, Saviay’a “Lul Pab” Robinson, exterior a gasoline station in Beverly Grove.

Prosecutors argue that protecting juror identities hidden is crucial to make sure impartiality and defend them from attainable threats. They cited Durk’s fame, the seriousness of the charges and the intense online attention surrounding the case.

Durk’s protection workforce stated they aren’t against withholding juror names from the general public, however they insist that protection counsel will need to have entry to these identities. They additionally emphasised that every one defendants and alleged co-conspirators are already in custody, eliminating any credible menace to jurors.

“Anonymity would convey to jurors that Mr. Banks is inherently dangerous, infringe upon his presumption of innocence, and prejudice the defense in the most fundamental of ways,” Findling acknowledged. “The government’s motion conflates generalized fears of publicity with actual threats of juror harm. None exist. Mr. Banks has no history of interference with the judicial process, no record of violence against witnesses or jurors, and no connection to organized crime.”

The protection argued that nameless juries are usually reserved for circumstances involving organized crime or confirmed makes an attempt to tamper with witnesses—neither of which applies right here.

They additionally warned that shielding juror identities might skew the choice course of and create bias. “An anonymous jury signals guilt before the first question is asked,” the movement learn.

As an alternate, Durk’s attorneys proposed utilizing juror numbers in open courtroom, sealing names for attorneys solely and explaining the anonymity as a technique to defend jurors from media consideration, not from the defendant.

If the courtroom approves the federal government’s request, jurors can be allowed to make use of pseudonyms and obtain additional safety protections. The decide has not but issued a ruling on the matter.

Durk stays in federal custody after being denied bail in May. The courtroom cited alleged violations involving telephone use whereas in detention. If convicted, he might face life in jail.

Related