In filings submitted in August, attorneys for Snoop Dogg, 53, and Ice Cube, 56, urged the courtroom to alleviate the artists from attending in-person depositions, calling the request “harassing, oppressive, and burdensome.” Counsel argued that their shoppers, as public figures with rigorous skilled schedules, wouldn’t present new or substantive info and as an alternative proposed that Westside query their affiliate, Tony Draper.

Westside declined the provide, prompting the artists’ authorized group to accuse the corporate of trying to “force a settlement” by procedural stress. Should the courtroom compel their look, the defendants requested to testify just about and restrict questioning to 2 hours. Court information point out Snoop Dogg was filming a film by October 21, whereas Ice Cube was managing his Big3 basketball league and making ready for a live performance tour.

Snoop Dogg, Ice Cube & Mount Westmore Sued For Alleged Fraud

In a September submitting, Westside urged the choose to disclaim the rappers’ movement and sanction them for delaying discovery. The firm claims it has been “extremely cooperative” and is looking for $11,000 in legal professional charges associated to the dispute. The courtroom has but to subject a ruling.

Westside first filed go well with in November 2023, naming Snoop Dogg, Ice Cube, E-40, Too Short, and their three way partnership, Mount Westmore LLC, as defendants. The criticism alleges the group breached a 2022 merchandising settlement by failing to satisfy promotional and touring obligations. Westside claims it superior the artists $1.375 million in alternate for unique rights to promote Mount Westmore-branded merchandise throughout a deliberate 60-date North American and European tour, which allegedly by no means materialized.

Counsel for the artists maintains they’ve acted in good religion. “Despite multiple efforts to resolve this matter amicably, Westside has refused to engage,” legal professional Frank Seddigh stated in a press release.

Westside’s lawyer, John Fowler, countered that the defendants are “avoiding difficult questions about their conduct.”